Hmm - Freudian slip perhaps? Well - maybe, but on 2nd thoughts the genius Romney just keeps on making gaffes. I had wanted to title this blog "mor(m)onic Presidential hopeful, but on reflection, moronic seems to just hit the spot.
G asked me : "why does he want to be the president anyway? I'm sure he'll just be another figurehead". She's quite right of course. He doesn't have the smarts to lead from the front, but I'm sure the administration will provide him with a brains trust to make decisions for him.
Maybe when he was a child, he was asked what he wanted to be when he grew up. And instead of becoming a fireman or maybe a garbage collector which is much more in his cerebral league, he decided to be the President of the USA. Come to think of it, I have a pretty good idea that if the legendary frontally lobotomised George Dubya Bush lasted 2 terms of office, it can't be a very demanding job when it comes to using your brain.
I mean c'mon - Romney clearly has absolutely no general knowledge at all : he opens his big flappy trap and inserts both left feet - perpetually. I wish they'd leave him to choke on his feet, and get done with it. Sheik temple instead of Sikh temple? If he actually knew anything about Indian religions (and we'd hope that somebody who presumed to become the most powerful leader in the Western world would actually know something outside of his own country- or even his own state), he would know that the Sikhs follow a religion founded in the 15th century in the Punjab region.
He introduces his presidential compaign running mate Paul Ryan as "the next president of the United States". Probably the best thing he could do, would be to stand aside and let someone with a brain go for the presidential top job. But that's not what he meant. In fact he didn't mean anything - he just freewheeled the brain and left the gob to flap away by itself. Which is very dangerous when you're in the highest profile job in the world.
By the way - be afraid of Paul Ryan - be very afraid. He's very intelligent - and a flip-flopper with the best of the political chameleons in order to stay ahead. He's also the author of the GOP. Here's a synopsis from a blogger :
American people don't know much about Ryan. When they discover what he stands for, they will decide who they will vote for.Ryan is the architect of radical right wing . His budget calls for
-- huge new tax cuts for the super rich on top of the Bush tax cuts
-- turning medicare into a voucher program
-- massive cuts to vital programs like medicaid, food stamps, pell grants & job training
-- new increases in military spending
Ryan is the author of everything the left has been fighting against in Washington since the repub took control of the house in 2010
Romney/Ryan ticket is a frightening prospect for the middle class and anyone who might need medicare or social security
By chosing Ryan, Romney doubled down on his commitment to take our country back to the failed policies of the past that got us to the mess.
If your like that picture go ahead vote republican
Consider the following link, where you can spend a few moments pondering these dumb Mitt Romney quotes. Look at the bonus section too.
http://politicalhumor.about.com/od/mittromney/a/Mitt-Romney-Quotes.htm
(I'm particularly incensed that he should DARE to be defensive to PETA criticism about popping his dog in a carrier on top of his roof rack and taking it for a twelve hour trip - and then say "my dog likes fresh air". A total Arsehole - with a huge capital A.
More ominously, he comes across as an insensitive, arrogant wise-arse who thinks his money allows him to say and do anything. He doesn't care - or have to care - about who he offends in the process of aerating his vocal chords. No forethought, no engagement and consideration beforehand - just open handbag mouth and vent. Or maybe he should rather fart - it sounds nicer than his mindless babble, and makes as much sense.
Then maybe you might wonder whether there is anything in the Romney head at all. It's a wonder he managed to get 2 Harvard degrees and a Brigham Young degree - although in all fairness, the latter was a BA, which doesn't count for much. And the Harvard degree was a joint Juris doctor/ MBA (master of bugger-all) - some of the biggest smooth talking management consultant dummies have MBA's. But he actually did really well, and at least at that time of his life, seemed to be quite bright.
I wonder if he's suffering from some advancing degenerative brain condition? Like Creutzfeldt-Jakob perhaps (the human counterpart of BSE - bovine spongiform encephalopathy - mad cow disease). Maybe he's been consuming too many of those offal-filled burgers and picked up an infective prion particle from a cow. It's really quite a conundrum - I would have thought that someone with his track record would be carefully considering his words before opening his mouth, but obviously the effect of his words do not give him pause for thought.
And his Mormonism is the most telling indication that in his heart of hearts (or should that be "heart of minds"?), he's a dummy. A fifth generation mormon - or should that be "moron"? I mean, here's the prospective next President of the US and he believes in the teachings of a man who claims to have dug up a bunch of gold plates, and translated them into the Book of Mormon and conveniently forgets what happened to them. Not only do they believe all the biblical crap, lock stock and barrel, but they believe a far-fetched aberrant offshoot of it. And their founder is a felon. Sod the truth - we'll believe the crap. It takes a special kind of uber-thick denial to be a fifth generation follower of that type of nonsense.
The real eye-opener is that this guy has a serious chance of actually becoming the next President. If he does, the Americans then have got what they deserved - because only a nation of idiots could put that into the White house. Makes "Dubya" look like a genius.
Postscript : having just watched Sky news newspaper reviews tonight... the world is laughing at this buffoon. And as G notes - he doesn't care - because he's busy playing the game. Nothing is registering - no synapses are firing. The lights are on, but nobody is at home. The only objective is the lust for illusory power of being in the White House. And when he gets there, he will smile like an idiot at the cameras and read from his prepared speaker notes and act as the directors of the play have decided he should do. We need idiots. Thinking presidents that buck the establishment get assassinated.
Saturday, August 11, 2012
Monday, June 25, 2012
Tax Man
Let me tell you how it will be,
There’s one for you, nineteen for me,
‘Cause I’m the Taxman,
Yeah, I’m the Taxman.
Should five per cent appear too small,
Be thankful I don’t take it all.
(If you drive a car ), I’ll tax the street,
(If you try to sit ), I’ll tax your seat,
(If you get too cold ), I’ll tax the heat,
(If you take a walk ), I’ll tax your feet.
Don’t ask me what I want it for
(Haha! Mister Wilson!)
If you don’t want to pay some more
(Haha! Mister Heath!),
Now my advice for those who die,
Declare the pennies on your eyes,
‘Cause I’m the Taxman,
Yeah, I’m the Taxman.
And you’re working for no-one but me,
(Harrison- 1966)
I was listening to Revolver again yesterday and once again, it occurred to me what masters of their craft The Beatles were. Not only were they way ahead of their contemporaries musically, at a time when the opposition were still exploring basic 12-bar 3 chord rock&roll, but they were also engaging their listeners lyrically on a plane somewhat above the average R&R commentary of the time, with some telling insights.
And of course George threw his toys out of the cot in 1966, what with Harold Wilson's Labour Government taking 95% of their earnings, at a time when The Beatles finally started to earn some real money. Small wonder then, this song. However I'm interested to note an almost visionary quality in some of the lyric.
Taxing the street? Toll roads of course
Tax the heat? Energy/Carbon taxes!
I'm not too sure yet about taxing your seat and taxing your feet, but I'm confident that governments everywhere will soon dream up a means of doing exactly this.
Certainly bridge tolls in the UK are very old, however I'm unsure as to whether roads were actively tolled - the M6 being the only new toll road. Anyway, I don't think there was any mention of energy taxes in 1966, so this qualifies as visionary! I'm kinda wondering if maybe the chancellor of the exchequer didn't take his lead from the Beatles in dreaming up a few new taxes....
And on George Harrison's solo tour of Japan in 1991 "If you're overweight I'll tax your fat".
Now there's a thought! Just what the world needs. I gather Britain is getting as chubby and lard-assed as the US with their shoddy eating and sedentary lifestyles these days. Imagine a compulsory annual medical assessment (which each person would have to pay for, of course) where one's weight was computed against frame and height, and each kilo over the "ideal" was progressively taxed! Would bring in a lot of money, and as a spinoff we'd have a large number of people losing some ugly fat. The rationale of course would be a "consumption tax" to disincentivise excess food consumption (particularly meat, since vegetables are virtually impossible as a means to gain weight substantially).
The only negative(!) would be that these folk would find their health improving - which is bad for Big Pharmaceuticals, the Mega Food industry with its "Factory Farms" and the medical profession. I guess for that reason there may never be a "fat tax" - too much unintended pressure on Big Business (pun intended).
And as for the pennies on one's eyes, of course estate duties are a well-entrenched tradition. The last person who gets a bite out of you before you go, is the taxman.
Thursday, June 21, 2012
MegaFartz Syndrome and 21st Century Cynicism
"Are you a man - over 50?
Do you wake up in the morning without a hard-on that can raise the roof and dislodge the roof tiles?
Do you wake up sometimes without an erection at all?
If so, you could be suffering from Floppicox Syndrome - YES! Floppicox Syndrome!!
Floppicox Syndrome was discovered by 2 doctors : Dr F.L. Opperman and Dr J.T (John Thomas) Cox
This potentially lethal disability can ruin your whole life and future happiness!
But Wait! There's hope! Ask your Doctor for Merck Lab's "Stiffen Up" or Pfizer's "Pole in a Mo' "
Ask today and live a life of freedom from tomorrow!" (Sounds more like Poppycock Syndrome to me).
Or what about this variant?
"Do your Fartz embarrass you? When was the last time your partner went "eeeeeuuuuggghhh!" when they came out of your recently-vacated toilet? Or when last did you notice traffic screeching to a halt outside because they thought it was the rumble of an earthquake - or maybe a ship sailing down the road, sounding its airhorn?
You could be a victim of Megafartz Syndrome. When you suffer from Megafartz, the little bacteria in the intestine get lazy and stop doing their job of breaking down nutrients into water and harmless CO2. Instead you get a buildup of deadly methane, sulphur dioxide and other atmospheric pollutants. And unchecked, in time, you can kill yourself and your family if you're not careful. And if you live in the EU, or in countries where they are monitoring carbon emissions, you could be presented with a nasty cold sharp measuring probe (for obvious uses), followed by a BIG fine.
But now there's hope. Lilly Labs in conjunction with Glaxo-Wellcome Smithkline Beecham have devised a life-saving new drug that effectively and safely calms and retrains the bacteria, reconverting them into models of bacterial efficiency. A single course - or maybe two - will result in peace and harmony in the home - and no nasty threat of Fart-Police raids embarrassing you and frightening the kids!
Ask your doctor about Lilly/ G-W SK-Beecham's "Fartless 'n Free" and set your intestines free again!"
Does any of this sound familiar? Go and watch "Big Bucks Big Pharma - Marketing Disease and Pushing Drugs" - how the large pharmaceutical companies cynically exploit our gullibility through advertising sickness - effectively inventing new disabilities for which we can spend huge amounts of money being "cured". See how the large pharmas get onto the bandwagon, offering incentives from the time the trainee doctors enrol at med school.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDsdc6kON3k
By the way - what do you think ADD is? Attention Deficit Disorder. Go and find out how much Big Pharma profited from this delicious little problem. What do you expect if you feed your kids junk food and sit them in front of a TV set all the time? Or TV games? (none of these in moderation). Did it ever occur to feed simple nutritious food, lots of exercise and stimulation of the mind and imagination - i.e. actually interact with your kids? Did anyone realise that kids need to be trained - as much to concentrate as to do anything else. Or is this too much like hard work?
Life doesn't come naturally - it takes training in all things. But no - somebody decided to give it a silly syndrome name (so we didn't have to feel guilty about being lousy parents), and out came the Big Pharma cure-all : drugs, drugs and more drugs- amphetamines, anti-depressents etc - all with side-effects for which you can be given more drugs.
Check out http://www.webmd.com/add-adhd/adhd-medication-chart and at the bottom of the chart we have:
"The FDA has issued a warning about the risk of drug abuse with amphetamine stimulants. FDA safety advisors are also concerned about the possibility that all amphetamine and methylphenidate stimulants used for ADHD may increase the risk of heart and psychiatric problems.
The FDA has also issued a warning about a connection between antidepressants (including the non-stimulant Strattera) and an increased risk of suicide in adults aged 18-24, especially in the first one or two months of treatment.
While these risks may seem alarming, keep in mind that experts generally consider these medicines safe...."
And if any of this disturbs you - and we hope it does, you can explore Codex Alimentarius
http://www.natural-health-information-centre.com/codex-alimentarius.html
and find out how the World Health Organisation in conjunction with Big Pharma and the large international financiers are rolling out an international agreement, which if implemented across all signatory countries, will result in our freedom to eat healthy and choose alternative and natural medications (including garlic, and even, potentially, water!!) being curtailed. I kid you not. Natural herbs, garlic etc. would be available only on prescription from a GP, and supplied only through Big Pharma.
Where I come from, that's called "anti-competitive practice". Sadly, governments are so hand in glove with large corporations these days, that they no longer seem to be prosecuting this. Your freedom to remain healthy by eating healthy has just been terminated. Go and stand in the sickie queue for your prescription.
Do we really think the pharmaceutical companies are going to put themselves out of business by allowing people to actually be cured of their ailments, or condoning prevention of illness through education?
As Donald Trump says "It's nothing personal - it's just business".
Spread the word - for your sake, mine, and everyone else's.
Do you wake up in the morning without a hard-on that can raise the roof and dislodge the roof tiles?
Do you wake up sometimes without an erection at all?
If so, you could be suffering from Floppicox Syndrome - YES! Floppicox Syndrome!!
Floppicox Syndrome was discovered by 2 doctors : Dr F.L. Opperman and Dr J.T (John Thomas) Cox
This potentially lethal disability can ruin your whole life and future happiness!
But Wait! There's hope! Ask your Doctor for Merck Lab's "Stiffen Up" or Pfizer's "Pole in a Mo' "
Ask today and live a life of freedom from tomorrow!" (Sounds more like Poppycock Syndrome to me).
Or what about this variant?
"Do your Fartz embarrass you? When was the last time your partner went "eeeeeuuuuggghhh!" when they came out of your recently-vacated toilet? Or when last did you notice traffic screeching to a halt outside because they thought it was the rumble of an earthquake - or maybe a ship sailing down the road, sounding its airhorn?
You could be a victim of Megafartz Syndrome. When you suffer from Megafartz, the little bacteria in the intestine get lazy and stop doing their job of breaking down nutrients into water and harmless CO2. Instead you get a buildup of deadly methane, sulphur dioxide and other atmospheric pollutants. And unchecked, in time, you can kill yourself and your family if you're not careful. And if you live in the EU, or in countries where they are monitoring carbon emissions, you could be presented with a nasty cold sharp measuring probe (for obvious uses), followed by a BIG fine.
But now there's hope. Lilly Labs in conjunction with Glaxo-Wellcome Smithkline Beecham have devised a life-saving new drug that effectively and safely calms and retrains the bacteria, reconverting them into models of bacterial efficiency. A single course - or maybe two - will result in peace and harmony in the home - and no nasty threat of Fart-Police raids embarrassing you and frightening the kids!
Ask your doctor about Lilly/ G-W SK-Beecham's "Fartless 'n Free" and set your intestines free again!"
Does any of this sound familiar? Go and watch "Big Bucks Big Pharma - Marketing Disease and Pushing Drugs" - how the large pharmaceutical companies cynically exploit our gullibility through advertising sickness - effectively inventing new disabilities for which we can spend huge amounts of money being "cured". See how the large pharmas get onto the bandwagon, offering incentives from the time the trainee doctors enrol at med school.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDsdc6kON3k
By the way - what do you think ADD is? Attention Deficit Disorder. Go and find out how much Big Pharma profited from this delicious little problem. What do you expect if you feed your kids junk food and sit them in front of a TV set all the time? Or TV games? (none of these in moderation). Did it ever occur to feed simple nutritious food, lots of exercise and stimulation of the mind and imagination - i.e. actually interact with your kids? Did anyone realise that kids need to be trained - as much to concentrate as to do anything else. Or is this too much like hard work?
Life doesn't come naturally - it takes training in all things. But no - somebody decided to give it a silly syndrome name (so we didn't have to feel guilty about being lousy parents), and out came the Big Pharma cure-all : drugs, drugs and more drugs- amphetamines, anti-depressents etc - all with side-effects for which you can be given more drugs.
Check out http://www.webmd.com/add-adhd/adhd-medication-chart and at the bottom of the chart we have:
"The FDA has issued a warning about the risk of drug abuse with amphetamine stimulants. FDA safety advisors are also concerned about the possibility that all amphetamine and methylphenidate stimulants used for ADHD may increase the risk of heart and psychiatric problems.
The FDA has also issued a warning about a connection between antidepressants (including the non-stimulant Strattera) and an increased risk of suicide in adults aged 18-24, especially in the first one or two months of treatment.
While these risks may seem alarming, keep in mind that experts generally consider these medicines safe...."
RIGHT!!! The Experts!!!! Which experts? Oh - those experts who have been receiving golf clubs, memberships, freebies, and weekly visits from the medical reps. Yeah - right. What happened to common-sense?
And if any of this disturbs you - and we hope it does, you can explore Codex Alimentarius
http://www.natural-health-information-centre.com/codex-alimentarius.html
and find out how the World Health Organisation in conjunction with Big Pharma and the large international financiers are rolling out an international agreement, which if implemented across all signatory countries, will result in our freedom to eat healthy and choose alternative and natural medications (including garlic, and even, potentially, water!!) being curtailed. I kid you not. Natural herbs, garlic etc. would be available only on prescription from a GP, and supplied only through Big Pharma.
Where I come from, that's called "anti-competitive practice". Sadly, governments are so hand in glove with large corporations these days, that they no longer seem to be prosecuting this. Your freedom to remain healthy by eating healthy has just been terminated. Go and stand in the sickie queue for your prescription.
Do we really think the pharmaceutical companies are going to put themselves out of business by allowing people to actually be cured of their ailments, or condoning prevention of illness through education?
As Donald Trump says "It's nothing personal - it's just business".
Spread the word - for your sake, mine, and everyone else's.
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Controlling the World
Now if I were to control the world, I'd break down the problem of how to do this into a number of layers, with different responsiblities, much as is done with spans of management control at different levels in any company. I'd assign roles and tasks for each layer (or level), and ensure a continual up/down information flow to ensure the process runs like a well-oiled machine.
I'd ensure the masses at the bottom were kept informed of only what they needed to know to run their little lives - using the media, PR and a bombardment of advertising, controlled economic disinformation and amusements. I'd try to ensure as far as possible that these people were not able to mass-communicate between them, in order to prevent alliances, and compare notes on who was doing what to whom. There's nothing wrong with free speech - but the common classes cannot be given a soapbox to broadcast from. Put another way - you can say what you like, as long as there's nobody to hear you.
Consider the model below :
Notes :
1. It's called "the Game", because it's not about money. The people running the world show are swimming in money. It's the love of the "hunt". It's a game - it's world domination. Monopoly on a grand scale.
2. World domination has always been a fantasy of the comic book James Bond-type megalomaniac villain. But in order to dominate the world, you need to be super wealthy and have the right players on your team. That's the level where the overarching global strategy and objective is set.
3. The elite secret societies are the forums where the more detailed planning and long term goals are hammered out. The attendees are the elite "right players" referred to above.
4. Since members of the secret societies include heads of state, royalty and all the major industrial and economic leaders, their respective corporations and governments become the Implementation layer below this. It is important here to have representation from governments, the media, financial and banking, and the major food and agriculture industries, so that the thrusts (or interventions) down on the broad population, can cover every avenue of life.
5. The implementation thrusts shown are hardly comprehensive. In fact every aspect of finance, culture, economics, health, agriculture and the military has to be covered in order for a concerted and successful world domination.
- military initiatives are typically used to open the door to "economic advisors and aid workers" who move in following a military withdrawal. The countries supplying troops thus have a springboard into the area of conflict. Examples of Military initiatives that have been used to start or join conflict with a view to achieving other agendas are :
- Vietnam
- 911 WTC "Attack" - lead to War on Terror and Springboard into Afghanistan and Pakistan
- Libya & overthrow of Ghaddafi
- Syria (currently in progress) - intention to disrupt the Syrian/Iranian axis
- Gulf of Tonkin incident - on declassified material is noted to never have happened, but it started a war
- Pearl Harbour - indications that the attack proceeded with the full knowledge of the US govt.
- Food farms (mass factory farming of animals under conditions of extreme stress and cruelty). The big players have to a large extent ousted the small farmer and control the means of food production to market. See Farmageddon to get more insight into how - with the cooperation and collusion of government, big Agri is putting the squeeze on small farmers to remove competition. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uah8LBUbfc
- GM Foods. Companies like Monsanto spring to mind. The typical modus operandi is to move into a new market with approval and support of the government and initially allow the farmers to reharvest and sell GM seed to each other. Then, when GM seed is widespead in the economy, Monsanto uses its patent law protection to prohibit farmers retaining and regrowing seed. Each season's new seed therefore has to be purchased anew from Monsanto. Wind and vector-borne cross pollination will ensure that even non-GM crops are eventually infiltrated by GM seed, for which Monsanto reaps the royalty flow. When harvests are good, Monsanto's royalties are good. When markets fail (as they have in South Africa twice since 2009), the country has to import extra grain to feed the population, putting pressure on the currency, and balance of payments. A bankrupt country is a country ready to take loans from the World Bank. See The World According to Monsanto to get a better idea http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJiIuQyStr4
- Big Pharmaceutical companies. An advertising onslaught on the public of new expensive drugs for old maladies, dressed up as new "syndromes". Expiring patents replaced by slightly different formulations and relaunched for another few years as brand new patent-protected drugs. See "FDA only Benefits Big Pharma and Big Food Corporations" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UahhlOvfXU .
See also Big Bucks Big Pharma http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDsdc6kON3k
- Assisted Instability. This can refer to insurrection and assistance to "resistance movements" in hot spots. A favourite ploy of certain governments is to destabilize a region and gain a foothold in working with resistance groups to overthrow established government forces. Regimes favourable to the destablising power are then established, and social and food aid is provided, as well as civilian and military advisers. Loans are given - all of which have to be paid back, failing which the foreign power sets up permanent infrastructure in the area and establishes its presence. However, it can also refer to opportunistic or planned destabilisation of a system or process. Take for example the recent Eurozone (Spanish) e-coli outbreak. No culprit was found and all has now gone quiet. But in the process, thousands of tons of fresh produce were destroyed, bankrupting farmers. Why? Control. Go and see "Evidence emerging that the e-coli Eurozone Superbug was Bio-Engineered to produce human fatalities" http://www.naturalnews.com/032622_ecoli_bioengineering.html
- Economics. An extremely powerful force - especially when it is used in scaremongering in order to produce a self-fulfilling prophecy. An example might be prominent international economists warning of a coming slowdown and shedding of jobs. Companies respond by shedding jobs and the resulting drop in disposable income and spending causes a contraction in the economy - exactly what was warned would happen. The counter example occurs once 2-3 years of economic hardship have been endured, and some economic bright spark comes on TV and tells the world that the worst is past and economies are growing again. Top Exec salary packages soar and (theoretically) companies start hiring again as a result of growth in economic activity, thereby getting more disposable income into the economy. Lies, damn lies and economics.
6. Then, the economic control layer ensures the controlled supply of money to the masses via their governments, through expeditious loans. Of course loans are a great asset in the hands of Banks, since this attracts high rates of interest. But loans have to be repaid and a bankrupt debtor is a prime target for economic control.
7. And from the bottom of the pile, the masses of the world's common people pay for the supply of commodities they receive- food, water, oil and fuels, housing, transport, medical etc. They also pay levies, taxes, tolls, royalties. And to cap it all, they attempt to "save" at a zero rate of interest (in South Africa currently, overdraft rates are around 9-10% p.a. while savings attract no growth) and incur bank charges in abundance. And to keep these people happy, we have a diet of fast foods, adverts telling them what they need to make their lives better and an endless supply of junk television. None of the really important events are ever seen on the news....
And that's how I would do it - set up the control layers, get the right movers and shakers and dominate and centralise the supply of commodities while pushing the independents out. In the process, centralise wealth in the hands of as few people as possible. At the time of writing, 0.5% of the world's population own almost 40% of the worlds wealth. Oh - nearly forgot. I'd also seek to censor the internet - since it is the only mouthpiece for the everyday person to achieve a potentially international audience. It also enables us common folk to find out exactly what all these miserable mega-bastards have been doing to us. And we can't have that, can we?
Easy, isn't it? Now go back to sleep. Enjoy your fast food and your telly and don't rock the boat.
(See also http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm for a chilling view of the history of power.)
I'd ensure the masses at the bottom were kept informed of only what they needed to know to run their little lives - using the media, PR and a bombardment of advertising, controlled economic disinformation and amusements. I'd try to ensure as far as possible that these people were not able to mass-communicate between them, in order to prevent alliances, and compare notes on who was doing what to whom. There's nothing wrong with free speech - but the common classes cannot be given a soapbox to broadcast from. Put another way - you can say what you like, as long as there's nobody to hear you.
Consider the model below :
Notes :
1. It's called "the Game", because it's not about money. The people running the world show are swimming in money. It's the love of the "hunt". It's a game - it's world domination. Monopoly on a grand scale.
2. World domination has always been a fantasy of the comic book James Bond-type megalomaniac villain. But in order to dominate the world, you need to be super wealthy and have the right players on your team. That's the level where the overarching global strategy and objective is set.
3. The elite secret societies are the forums where the more detailed planning and long term goals are hammered out. The attendees are the elite "right players" referred to above.
4. Since members of the secret societies include heads of state, royalty and all the major industrial and economic leaders, their respective corporations and governments become the Implementation layer below this. It is important here to have representation from governments, the media, financial and banking, and the major food and agriculture industries, so that the thrusts (or interventions) down on the broad population, can cover every avenue of life.
5. The implementation thrusts shown are hardly comprehensive. In fact every aspect of finance, culture, economics, health, agriculture and the military has to be covered in order for a concerted and successful world domination.
- military initiatives are typically used to open the door to "economic advisors and aid workers" who move in following a military withdrawal. The countries supplying troops thus have a springboard into the area of conflict. Examples of Military initiatives that have been used to start or join conflict with a view to achieving other agendas are :
- Vietnam
- 911 WTC "Attack" - lead to War on Terror and Springboard into Afghanistan and Pakistan
- Libya & overthrow of Ghaddafi
- Syria (currently in progress) - intention to disrupt the Syrian/Iranian axis
- Gulf of Tonkin incident - on declassified material is noted to never have happened, but it started a war
- Pearl Harbour - indications that the attack proceeded with the full knowledge of the US govt.
- Food farms (mass factory farming of animals under conditions of extreme stress and cruelty). The big players have to a large extent ousted the small farmer and control the means of food production to market. See Farmageddon to get more insight into how - with the cooperation and collusion of government, big Agri is putting the squeeze on small farmers to remove competition. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5uah8LBUbfc
- GM Foods. Companies like Monsanto spring to mind. The typical modus operandi is to move into a new market with approval and support of the government and initially allow the farmers to reharvest and sell GM seed to each other. Then, when GM seed is widespead in the economy, Monsanto uses its patent law protection to prohibit farmers retaining and regrowing seed. Each season's new seed therefore has to be purchased anew from Monsanto. Wind and vector-borne cross pollination will ensure that even non-GM crops are eventually infiltrated by GM seed, for which Monsanto reaps the royalty flow. When harvests are good, Monsanto's royalties are good. When markets fail (as they have in South Africa twice since 2009), the country has to import extra grain to feed the population, putting pressure on the currency, and balance of payments. A bankrupt country is a country ready to take loans from the World Bank. See The World According to Monsanto to get a better idea http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJiIuQyStr4
- Big Pharmaceutical companies. An advertising onslaught on the public of new expensive drugs for old maladies, dressed up as new "syndromes". Expiring patents replaced by slightly different formulations and relaunched for another few years as brand new patent-protected drugs. See "FDA only Benefits Big Pharma and Big Food Corporations" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3UahhlOvfXU .
See also Big Bucks Big Pharma http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDsdc6kON3k
- Assisted Instability. This can refer to insurrection and assistance to "resistance movements" in hot spots. A favourite ploy of certain governments is to destabilize a region and gain a foothold in working with resistance groups to overthrow established government forces. Regimes favourable to the destablising power are then established, and social and food aid is provided, as well as civilian and military advisers. Loans are given - all of which have to be paid back, failing which the foreign power sets up permanent infrastructure in the area and establishes its presence. However, it can also refer to opportunistic or planned destabilisation of a system or process. Take for example the recent Eurozone (Spanish) e-coli outbreak. No culprit was found and all has now gone quiet. But in the process, thousands of tons of fresh produce were destroyed, bankrupting farmers. Why? Control. Go and see "Evidence emerging that the e-coli Eurozone Superbug was Bio-Engineered to produce human fatalities" http://www.naturalnews.com/032622_ecoli_bioengineering.html
- Economics. An extremely powerful force - especially when it is used in scaremongering in order to produce a self-fulfilling prophecy. An example might be prominent international economists warning of a coming slowdown and shedding of jobs. Companies respond by shedding jobs and the resulting drop in disposable income and spending causes a contraction in the economy - exactly what was warned would happen. The counter example occurs once 2-3 years of economic hardship have been endured, and some economic bright spark comes on TV and tells the world that the worst is past and economies are growing again. Top Exec salary packages soar and (theoretically) companies start hiring again as a result of growth in economic activity, thereby getting more disposable income into the economy. Lies, damn lies and economics.
6. Then, the economic control layer ensures the controlled supply of money to the masses via their governments, through expeditious loans. Of course loans are a great asset in the hands of Banks, since this attracts high rates of interest. But loans have to be repaid and a bankrupt debtor is a prime target for economic control.
7. And from the bottom of the pile, the masses of the world's common people pay for the supply of commodities they receive- food, water, oil and fuels, housing, transport, medical etc. They also pay levies, taxes, tolls, royalties. And to cap it all, they attempt to "save" at a zero rate of interest (in South Africa currently, overdraft rates are around 9-10% p.a. while savings attract no growth) and incur bank charges in abundance. And to keep these people happy, we have a diet of fast foods, adverts telling them what they need to make their lives better and an endless supply of junk television. None of the really important events are ever seen on the news....
And that's how I would do it - set up the control layers, get the right movers and shakers and dominate and centralise the supply of commodities while pushing the independents out. In the process, centralise wealth in the hands of as few people as possible. At the time of writing, 0.5% of the world's population own almost 40% of the worlds wealth. Oh - nearly forgot. I'd also seek to censor the internet - since it is the only mouthpiece for the everyday person to achieve a potentially international audience. It also enables us common folk to find out exactly what all these miserable mega-bastards have been doing to us. And we can't have that, can we?
Easy, isn't it? Now go back to sleep. Enjoy your fast food and your telly and don't rock the boat.
(See also http://www.iamthewitness.com/DarylBradfordSmith_Rothschild.htm for a chilling view of the history of power.)
Sunday, June 17, 2012
Debunking Christianity in 5 Points
Easy - piece of cake.
1. Adam and Eve is a bunch of B/S. Reason? Because you can never achieve the staggering range of human genetic diversity from in-breeding two adults. It's impossible. Who do you use for a genetic out-cross? Did Adam copulate with his daughter- and vice versa Eve with her son? Or brother to sister? Did it create genetic diversity or genetic homogeneity? If you don't know what I'm talking about, take a basic course in genetics and find out.
2. No Adam and Eve? Yes - you say "I agree it's just a story". Really? Then what happens to the doctrine (there's that word again - (man-made) doctrine) of original sin? No original sin means nobody inherits the mantle of "sinner by inheritance" because we didn't fall into sin in the garden of Eden in the first place.
3. No original sin means there is nothing to "forgive" anyone for. This means there is no need for a "sacrifice" to God, because we cannot be accused of being sinners from the foundation of the world.
4. This means there is no need for eternal atonement from sin. Therefore no need for Jesus and his coming to Earth , dying "rising again" and etc. It's pointless. It may be the same old hacked-up god-man story as the other 49 that preceded it in ancient mythology, but that's beside the point.
5. So if there was actually a Jesus Christ, he was a poseur - it was probably Jesus Cohen trying to make a fast buck. Not that there is any historic evidence for the existence of the "greatest hero" the world has ever known, mind you. Go and look for yourself.
We're on our own. Grow up and get used to it - and start to become more socially responsible for the world you leave behind - because nobody is going to fix it with the wave of a magic wand.
The end.
1. Adam and Eve is a bunch of B/S. Reason? Because you can never achieve the staggering range of human genetic diversity from in-breeding two adults. It's impossible. Who do you use for a genetic out-cross? Did Adam copulate with his daughter- and vice versa Eve with her son? Or brother to sister? Did it create genetic diversity or genetic homogeneity? If you don't know what I'm talking about, take a basic course in genetics and find out.
2. No Adam and Eve? Yes - you say "I agree it's just a story". Really? Then what happens to the doctrine (there's that word again - (man-made) doctrine) of original sin? No original sin means nobody inherits the mantle of "sinner by inheritance" because we didn't fall into sin in the garden of Eden in the first place.
3. No original sin means there is nothing to "forgive" anyone for. This means there is no need for a "sacrifice" to God, because we cannot be accused of being sinners from the foundation of the world.
4. This means there is no need for eternal atonement from sin. Therefore no need for Jesus and his coming to Earth , dying "rising again" and etc. It's pointless. It may be the same old hacked-up god-man story as the other 49 that preceded it in ancient mythology, but that's beside the point.
5. So if there was actually a Jesus Christ, he was a poseur - it was probably Jesus Cohen trying to make a fast buck. Not that there is any historic evidence for the existence of the "greatest hero" the world has ever known, mind you. Go and look for yourself.
We're on our own. Grow up and get used to it - and start to become more socially responsible for the world you leave behind - because nobody is going to fix it with the wave of a magic wand.
The end.
Friday, May 4, 2012
Bigger and Better
Isn't this the typical human desire - get it bigger and better, faster, 2X as many features etc.? And don't we always fall for this ad-schlok hook, line and sinker?
In addition to cats, photography is another of my passions. Not that I do it particularly well, but I'm trying and hopefully one day I'll be able to take more consistently good photos.
I was drooling over the Nikon D7000 reviews the other day when a comment came to mind, from one of our local folk who is a pretty damn good photographer. He mentioned that he had around 20 cameras - and he has taken good and bad photos with every one of them.
The difference is the person behind the lens. To them falls the understanding of the tool in their hands, their knowledge, technique and understanding of light, their creativity, their ability to view the world through the eyes of an artist - because photography is an art form.
As Darren Rowse wrote : "Sometimes I think our lust for cameras and gear could be getting in the way of actually becoming better photographers.”
The Nikon D7000 is a wonderful camera for an amateur enthusiast like me - but frankly I'm not sure how I could justify buying it. The reason being that I still don't know all the workings of my Canon, and I continually rely on the camera making key decisions for me - like speed and ISO settings for a given aperture. I think that when I get to the stage that I understand all that the camera can do, and that I am capable of twiddling all the settings to achieve my creative designs, then I will have a better idea of the real shortcomings of the camera (if any - for my purposes).
I will by all means buy a new camera - but will do so only when I'm sure in my mind why I need one, what my current equipment cannot do for me, and how the proposed new camera will be able to fulfil my artistic objectives.
My son in law got my old camera - a Panasonic which was pretty good, but not up to my Canon spec. His brother took some photos with it when they were on a trip in Namibia recently. The desert scenes he shot were magnificent - hue and texture, light and dark, skillful use of silhouette and background, composition and planning of the picture. He's not a photographer - but he has passion and he's an artist.
Now there is a man who knows how to look, and to see......
In the mean time, maybe I'll practice looking. Maybe there's a lesson there for all of us.
In addition to cats, photography is another of my passions. Not that I do it particularly well, but I'm trying and hopefully one day I'll be able to take more consistently good photos.
I was drooling over the Nikon D7000 reviews the other day when a comment came to mind, from one of our local folk who is a pretty damn good photographer. He mentioned that he had around 20 cameras - and he has taken good and bad photos with every one of them.
The difference is the person behind the lens. To them falls the understanding of the tool in their hands, their knowledge, technique and understanding of light, their creativity, their ability to view the world through the eyes of an artist - because photography is an art form.
As Darren Rowse wrote : "Sometimes I think our lust for cameras and gear could be getting in the way of actually becoming better photographers.”
And Valerie Jardin added in her article Stop whining about your equipment, Get out there and shoot! : "That new camera and expensive lens does not create a good picture. You do! ....A new camera will not make you a better photographer. Period. It will only make you a new camera owner. To become a better photographer, learn to see. Learn to see the new and see the familiar as new."
The Nikon D7000 is a wonderful camera for an amateur enthusiast like me - but frankly I'm not sure how I could justify buying it. The reason being that I still don't know all the workings of my Canon, and I continually rely on the camera making key decisions for me - like speed and ISO settings for a given aperture. I think that when I get to the stage that I understand all that the camera can do, and that I am capable of twiddling all the settings to achieve my creative designs, then I will have a better idea of the real shortcomings of the camera (if any - for my purposes).
I will by all means buy a new camera - but will do so only when I'm sure in my mind why I need one, what my current equipment cannot do for me, and how the proposed new camera will be able to fulfil my artistic objectives.
My son in law got my old camera - a Panasonic which was pretty good, but not up to my Canon spec. His brother took some photos with it when they were on a trip in Namibia recently. The desert scenes he shot were magnificent - hue and texture, light and dark, skillful use of silhouette and background, composition and planning of the picture. He's not a photographer - but he has passion and he's an artist.
Now there is a man who knows how to look, and to see......
In the mean time, maybe I'll practice looking. Maybe there's a lesson there for all of us.
Bull$#it Baffles Brains
This was a favourite saying my father had. The meaning of course is that the more bull that is talked, the more people get taken in by it. I think the brain closes down in protest to the unrelenting deluge of airborne shite being pumped in through the ears and eyes - "Please PLEASE!!! I give up - I'll believe - just SHUT UP already!!!!!"
Get the picture?
Now - to the point. Remember last year on May 1st when Bulldust O'Barmy got up and proclaimed to the world that the Americans had killed nasty old Obama Bin Lying? Jolly good, old chap, what? Hear Hear, and the US patted itself on the back.
Well - guess what? Exactly one year to the day they are raving on again about having found "hidden" documents disclosing all sorts of dirty secrets about Al Quaeda, and how old Bin Laden was sitting cooking up plotlets and more plotlets etc. etc. bla bla. The timing is fantastic - and fantastically improbable.
We all realise (well maybe not "all" - it seems that there are a remarkable number of people in the world whose gullibility is positively gobsmacking and who don't know an impossible coincidence when it's served up right in front of them), that the US intelligence community are quite clever. But they are rather overwhelmed by their own intellects and fall down by assuming everyone in the world are bloody idiots and believe all the crap they dish up. For those of us who aren't so stupid, consider the following :
- On Sept 11 2001, NORAD (the N American Air defense capability) inexplicably delayed in scrambling fighters to intercept and destroy the "hijacked" aircraft
- the 3 buildings that collapsed all were steel framed constructs and were the first (and only) 3 buildings in history to collapse because of fire damage
- this collapse took in the region of 9.3 seconds to occur. For those interested in physics, the formulas of motion reveal that given the height of the buildings, all support columns had to have been sheared simultaneously - in other words the WTC towers were in freefall.
- nanothermites (explosive) remnants were found in the wreckage of the buildings.
- a prominent congressman suddenly changed a normal daily habit and called off breakfast on the morning of 9/11
- abnormally high volumes of financial futures trades took place in securities of companies which would get badly hurt by the disaster, in the days preceding Sept 11th, making hideous amounts of money for the traders.
- the WTC disaster is the first time in recent memory that the FAA was barred from examining a crash site
- it is on record that authorities agreed that WTC7 had to be "pulled" (demolished) because of damage from the other 2 WTC towers. It collapsed the same day. The only problem is that demolition rigging takes weeks of work. So therefore somebody rigged it in advance, didn't they?
- the WTC demolition material was speedily disposed of in a landfill
- all of the aircraft manufacturers whose planes are involved in the disasters deny the engine found at the Pentagon on the lawn is one of theirs. So what hit the Pentagon?
- George W Bush's brother just happened to be the head of the security company responsible for the WTC complex.
- then the man everybody wants is found and killed, but not before his wife is shot dead. No - sorry! Shot in the leg - the story changed. She obviously is not dead, but nobody hears from her again about what actually happened - or didn't.
- and then Bin Laden's body is not retained and shown as proof of the kill - it's quickly (in indecent haste) disposed of in the sea.
- In fact, Bin Laden is widely thought to have died as early as 2002 from advanced kidney failure. He had 2 dialysis machines and was in and out of hospitals - including a CIA hospital around the time of the WTC disaster.
"No really - the cheque is in the mail". "Honest!" Yeah - right.
Nasty bunch of coincidences and unexplained nonsense - isn't it? And in my experience, when the type of B/S described above takes place, somebody is always lying.
Bullshit baffles brains. And the more you say it and the louder you get, the more people believe it - sometimes.
There is another saying "you can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time".
So why on Earth would I believe that the US has suddenly unearthed the Bin Laden secrets? The CIA may have been spending a year manufacturing them, but that's not the same thing, is it?
Get the picture?
Now - to the point. Remember last year on May 1st when Bulldust O'Barmy got up and proclaimed to the world that the Americans had killed nasty old Obama Bin Lying? Jolly good, old chap, what? Hear Hear, and the US patted itself on the back.
Well - guess what? Exactly one year to the day they are raving on again about having found "hidden" documents disclosing all sorts of dirty secrets about Al Quaeda, and how old Bin Laden was sitting cooking up plotlets and more plotlets etc. etc. bla bla. The timing is fantastic - and fantastically improbable.
We all realise (well maybe not "all" - it seems that there are a remarkable number of people in the world whose gullibility is positively gobsmacking and who don't know an impossible coincidence when it's served up right in front of them), that the US intelligence community are quite clever. But they are rather overwhelmed by their own intellects and fall down by assuming everyone in the world are bloody idiots and believe all the crap they dish up. For those of us who aren't so stupid, consider the following :
- On Sept 11 2001, NORAD (the N American Air defense capability) inexplicably delayed in scrambling fighters to intercept and destroy the "hijacked" aircraft
- the 3 buildings that collapsed all were steel framed constructs and were the first (and only) 3 buildings in history to collapse because of fire damage
- this collapse took in the region of 9.3 seconds to occur. For those interested in physics, the formulas of motion reveal that given the height of the buildings, all support columns had to have been sheared simultaneously - in other words the WTC towers were in freefall.
- nanothermites (explosive) remnants were found in the wreckage of the buildings.
- a prominent congressman suddenly changed a normal daily habit and called off breakfast on the morning of 9/11
- abnormally high volumes of financial futures trades took place in securities of companies which would get badly hurt by the disaster, in the days preceding Sept 11th, making hideous amounts of money for the traders.
- the WTC disaster is the first time in recent memory that the FAA was barred from examining a crash site
- it is on record that authorities agreed that WTC7 had to be "pulled" (demolished) because of damage from the other 2 WTC towers. It collapsed the same day. The only problem is that demolition rigging takes weeks of work. So therefore somebody rigged it in advance, didn't they?
- the WTC demolition material was speedily disposed of in a landfill
- all of the aircraft manufacturers whose planes are involved in the disasters deny the engine found at the Pentagon on the lawn is one of theirs. So what hit the Pentagon?
- George W Bush's brother just happened to be the head of the security company responsible for the WTC complex.
- then the man everybody wants is found and killed, but not before his wife is shot dead. No - sorry! Shot in the leg - the story changed. She obviously is not dead, but nobody hears from her again about what actually happened - or didn't.
- and then Bin Laden's body is not retained and shown as proof of the kill - it's quickly (in indecent haste) disposed of in the sea.
- In fact, Bin Laden is widely thought to have died as early as 2002 from advanced kidney failure. He had 2 dialysis machines and was in and out of hospitals - including a CIA hospital around the time of the WTC disaster.
"No really - the cheque is in the mail". "Honest!" Yeah - right.
Nasty bunch of coincidences and unexplained nonsense - isn't it? And in my experience, when the type of B/S described above takes place, somebody is always lying.
Bullshit baffles brains. And the more you say it and the louder you get, the more people believe it - sometimes.
There is another saying "you can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time".
So why on Earth would I believe that the US has suddenly unearthed the Bin Laden secrets? The CIA may have been spending a year manufacturing them, but that's not the same thing, is it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)